our ability to determine

Suppose that we put one gram of radium in a time vault & leave it there for 1600 years, when we return we will find that only half a gram of radium is left.

This phenomenon is termed by physicists as 'half life'. Radium atoms will naturally disintegrate such that only half of them would remain behind every 1600 years.
If we put that half gram back in the vault for another 1600 years, only 1/4 of the original would remain.

Every 1600 years half of the radium atoms would just disappear.
This is familiar to most of us, as this is what we have learned in high school.

We know this as a statistical fact, that every 1600 years, half of the original radium atoms would just disappear, but we don't know which half or which of the actual radium atoms would disappear.
We cannot pinpoint which would remain or which would disintegrate.
We can only state that half of them would disintegrate in 1600 years.

The curious thing is that if all radium of the original one gram atoms are similar what makes half of them to remain and the other half to disintegrate. As such they the radium atoms are all similar, which is why we can't determine which ones would remain and which would disintegrate.

The fact is that the study of quantum mechanics can only determine the end effect, but cannot determine which constituents would meet that end effect as explained in the example above. To that effect quantum mechanics provides us just statistical fact about the effect and not what actually caused the effect.

Ergo it ushers in the realm of probability. Since it is limited in determining which atom of radium in a gram would disintegrate, it states that every atom of radium in that 1 gram of radium has a 50% probability to disintegrate in 1600 years.

And so our knowledge about quantum mechanics - the most profound discovery in the 20th century is that it can gives us an ability to correlate observed phenomena with theory in aggregation but not in individual basis, as we don't know how each atom would act - that is to disintegrate or remain, but we do know as a whole 50% of the radium atoms would disintegrate.

the reserve

the federal reserve is not owned by the government of USA.
The federal reserve was enacted by an act of the Congress & reports to it, but is not owned by the government of USA.
It is an independent entity owned by members banks.
The member banks hold shares of the FED, making it an entity of the member bansk, as the FED themselves claim - no one in particular owns the FED.
The curious thing is are there any government banks in USA?.. as far as I know, they are all private. So if it is the private banks that are the member banks of the federal reserve & they hold control, the federal reserve would be pursuing private interests and not public.

the federal reserve states this tacitly as - "independent within the government"

The MOOT point is that the central bank of USA - the federal reserve is controlled by private bankers NOT by the government - which should immediately raise the question who interests does the FED serve.
Like any company or corporation, the firm serves the interests of the shareholders in this case the member banks which means private interests and not public interests.

In this light it makes sense why the fed is bailing out Fannie Mae and Feddie Mac, it is not public interests but private interests that are being insured.

Similarly across the continent; guess who owns the bank of England, ..yes private bankers again.
That makes 2 countries housing the financial capitals of the world - New York and London, both the venture of private banks.

This puts the private banker in a very powerful position, as the nations central banker, they have the right to print money too.

The connection between both these central bankers is that on account of the subprime crisis in US and UK, the respective central banks are being bailing out troubled banks. That puts land on which these bad mortguages stand written in favour of the central banker - directly or indirectly.

Could it be then that this sub prime crisis could have been actually manufactured, so as to lead to a subprime crisis leading to handing out property in the central bankers favour. The subprime that has affected UK and USA - could perhaps be the brain child of these very same private banks.

The 2 things you need in an economy: land and money, rest assured with these 2 you can own the world.

These member banks are trying to keep the wealth of the nations in just the hands of the few. That is in the hands of the private bankers themselves.
Being the richest banks is not enough, being the banks that control every industry on earth is what these private bankers are venturing to achieve...

In contrast the central bank of India is owned by the government.

irony

Two instances of news caught my attention.

The first being that we have been granted access by the NSG(Nuclear Material Supply Group) to fissile material. This material would be used to meet civilian energy needs vide nuclear power generation.

The irony is the the NSG was formed in 1974, when India detonated a nuclear device sounding off to the world that India is nuclear capable. To join the NSG you ought to be a signatory of the CTBT(comprehensive Test Ban Treaty) and NPT(Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty)

India is not a signatory to either treaties but has been granted access to Nuclear Fissile Material.

The irony is that the NSG, the clique formed to keep India at bay in 1974, is the very same clique we have been granted entry to.

The second instance of news is the Tata NANO project; work at the site has been stalled by the opposing party (TC - Tinamool Congress) of the state (West Bengal) on the pretext that the ruling party in the state (CPI-Communist party of India) had granted about 800 acres of land owned by farmers to the Tata to put up the NANO project much against farmer's wishes and rights.

The communist party (CPI) is known to have shut down a lot of private enterprises in that state with their strikes in private enterprises. The very same CPI had a change of heart and had invited private enterprises back into the state.

The irony here is a communist state government had invited a private capitalist company for investments in the state, but the private company (TATA) shelved their project in the state by the opposing party on account of strikes and blockades, methods used by the opposing party that were once used by the communists party of India driving away private enterprises from the state.

I guess politics is all about conveniences at the whim and whit of politicians.

internet service

my internet had chocked this afternoon; so I had got on the phone to place a complain. The personnel mentioned to me that I could now place my complains or request online too.

well buddy if I don't have the internet working, how do I place a complain on-line...

I hope it gets the genius at the internet company to rethink on service support.