the no-God prognosis

What does the absence of a God mean?
Fellow Atheists and Agnostics resort to feverish pitches to make you and I believe what they themselves believe.

The end of God also means the end of hope and faith.
The end of hope and faith also precludes the inclusiveness of randomness.
The inclusiveness of randomness in life precludes an indeterminate fate and destiny.

First things first, hope and faith. In the absence of God what would one hope for and have faith on. These words and emotions cease to have meaning.

I hope in myself and have faith in myself. I decide what happens next as I have faith in myself, in a sense yes you do, but also you don't because you still don't know what happens next.
For those outcomes that you are not aware of, your decision will at best be an after thought once the event has taken place.

What a faith and hope in oneself means is I can guarantee my future. I don't think there is any individual living that can guarantee anything about oneself leave alone the future.

Faith and Hope in oneself is meaningless, so most probably it would be directed to the outside. The atheists claim faith & hope in science and the agnostics need proof for faith and hope in something.

For the agnostic faith and hope should cease to exist when you need proof.
Faith and hope does not exist on proof, they are intangible.

For the Atheist who rests on science & believes on the finite ability of science accepts that science till date is limited to the knowledge of today, however he hopes against hope (though it is implausible and he shouldn't as I mentioned above) that tomorrow there would be a efficient theory on the explanation about life and everything, but suffice to say for an Atheist that is the way, the knowledge of today is sufficient for one to exist today because tomorrow by all means science will be better equipped to answer questions of today and yesterday but will answer them tomorrow.
This is absurd but then this is the scientists claim of the no God prognosis.
There are those who say that we would have an ultimate theory in this or the next decade that would explain life and everything.

But given that knowledge will always be finite, if it does get infinite then you will be able to figure out the future and if you do figure out the future, you do make an indeterminate random event determinate, but then it cannot be determinate because if it is determinate then there is a God. Oh sorry, it will always be finite knowledge and indeterminate future. So you will always be limited to the today of tomorrow that is. Thats how knowledge is and that is the implicit attribute about knowledge.

Life is random because things just came to be out of nothing, and are so now and will continue so for a billion or so of years and what is the point of all this, I don't know the atheists claims there is no God ask him what is the point!!!.

The next is the inclusiveness of randomness in a life devoid of hope and faith. It would be impossible to hope and have faith in pions, kaons, and B-mesons, the very particles we are composed of, our planets are composed of and everything that we see. It would be giving the pions, kaons and B-mesons too much credit. I mean do they really care, which species live and which species dies, but they continue to exist, but then how did they come to be.
Maybe their creation or existence was a no-point random event.

As things just came to be and happen to be and lead to life.
We all just live for our life span and hand the baton to the next in line. Maybe as a race or species we would be wiped out in the far future just like many species were wiped out before us. So what is the point of the probabilistic event called life, actually it is nothing - according to the atheists.
What is the point of all the knowledge, a knowledge that still keeps life random, that can't explain everything.
It would amount to nothing.
So we have a limited life as a species, we will have a limit on the knowledge we will acquire, so what do we do:
To such a one as this, it is live and be merry for tomorrow we all die.

In a random world, there is no fate & no destiny.
There is no determinate path & there is no purpose.
You just are because you are.
How can one have a fate & destiny in a no-point random life.
Creation is a random event, you are a random creation, your existence is random so what are you doing here.....

The point of this is, that the argument made is not one against God, but one against faith, hope, determinism, destiny and a purpose placed on each of our lives.

If people are convinced on randomness, God automatically will get ruled out.

However, that is not so!
There is too much information out there in the world, sometimes we get hoodwinked into believing the lie.
The information in itself is too cluttered for us to remove the noise.